Expenses incurred by the College in entertaining the Visitor and his entourage appear in the annual accounts. In 1539, the College Bursar recorded the cost of fish and spices purchased for the Visitation dinner, and the payment for laundering the table linen afterward.
This exhibition is based on the fourth Lincoln Unlocked lecture given by Visiting Researcher Dr Andrew Foster.
A College Visitor is an external figure of authority on whom the College can call for advice and for arbitration if insoluble dispute arises amongst its Governing Body, as a successor to the Founder.
At Christ Church and Oriel College, for example, as Royal foundations, the Visitor is the reigning monarch. The Queen is also Visitor at University College. At All Souls, Keble, and Merton it is the Archbishop of Canterbury; at Queen’s, the Archbishop of York; Corpus Christi, Brasenose, Exeter, Lincoln, Magdalen, New, St Anne’s, St John’s, St Peter’s, Trinity, and Wadham have bishops; Hertford, Lady Margaret Hall, Pembroke, St Edmund Hall’s, and Somerville colleges have the Chancellor of the University as their Visitor. (Oxford Archives Consortium, accessed 16/02/2022)
In succession to our Founder, Lincoln College’s Visitor is the Bishop of Lincoln. Bishops of Lincoln were also Visitors of Balliol (although the link was severed in 1691), Oriel, and Brasenose and King’s College, Cambridge.
A Visitor ‘had the power to interpret statutes, to issue injunctions, to deprive heads and fellows, to settle disputes among the members and to carry out formal visitations, investigating the conduct of secular and spiritual business.’ (History of the University v.3, Penry Williams). In his exploration of the role of the College Visitor in Oxford, 1550-1700 in the fourth Lincoln Unlocked Lecture, ecclesiastical historian Dr Andrew Foster made clear that whilst the above description sounds like one of great power and influence, the records suggest that Visitors were in practice more usually called upon to provide judgements with reference to college statutes when heads of colleges or fellows were in dispute; there is little evidence that they were much engaged in major changes of policy and practice. Rarely do we have details of a visitation with questions that go beyond checking compliance with the statutes and an audit of accounts.
Of the 16 bishops of Lincoln between 1557 and 1705, there is evidence for substantial involvement of only about half of those men in Lincoln College affairs. There was a break in the relationship between 1646 and 1660, as there were no longer any bishops with jurisdiction, and after 1647, all Oxford colleges answered to a board of Parliamentary Visitors. The archives post-Reformation indicate contact was largely initiated by those within the colleges, with no sign of a regular relationship other than through routine rituals of appointment and occasional disputes.
So when did Lincoln’s Visitor get involved? Bishop Cooper was concerned about Catholic recusants in the College in 1574, and later drawn into the contested election of Rector John Underhill in 1577. Elections of Fellows gave Bishop Chaderton headaches in the 1590s. In 1627, there were disputes about payment of battells, problems that occurred on a grander scale in the 1680s, when the incompetence of a Bursar led to a fellowship being temporarily suspended with the agreement of Bishop Barlow. And when the diocese of Oxford was carved out of the sprawling diocese of Lincoln in 1542, the rights of Visitors and colleges relating to their livings were protected, but the bishops of Oxford needed reminding of this by the Visitor several times during the 17th century.
Dr Andrew Foster FRHistS, FSA, FHA is an ecclesiastical historian who has written numerous articles on bishops, cathedrals, clergy, parishes and churchwardens of early modern England. He is a long-standing Literary Director of the Sussex Record Society and is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow at the University of Kent.